The original issue with this, or the urban legend, anyway, was that you could send an email to two people, each of whom had their auto replies on, and set to respond to all. The theory was that these two other mailboxes would then start replying to each other. When the reply was received, they’d reply again, and so on, ad infinitum.
As soon as the default rule to only reply once to each address was set, that issue disappeared though.
]]>And I recall Exchange being smart enough to only send an Out-of-Office message to the first incoming message from each recipient.
The security thing might be to prevent someone finding out that so-and-so is out, then driving to their house and ripping them off. Which seems a bit ridiculous to worry about.
]]>I remember that Novell Groupwise once had that issue, but it was resolved by a check to see if the auto reply had been triggered to that email address since the rule had been enacted. Net effect was that it would only send one reply to any given email address, alleviating this issue.
From what I’ve seen, Exchange works in the same way. I’ve forwarded several emails to my boss this last week, and never received another reply. I can’t see why it would react differently externally, and indeed the MS article doesn’t mention that as a reason.
]]>Here I would like to know if the option is enable can be by sending a great number of e-mails crash the Exchange Server? If yes then I can better understand.
Kind regards,
Dennis